Benling Falcon vs Atumobile Atum Version 1.0
Falcon vs Atum Version 1.0
| Key Highlights | Falcon | Atum Version 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Time | 4 Hr | 3-4 Hr |
| Range | 70-75 km/charge | 100 km/charge |
| Top Speed | 25 km/Hr | 25 km/Hr |
Benling Falcon vs Atumobile Atum Version 1.0 Comparison
- VS
| Basic Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| On-Road Price | Rs.73,134 onwards | Rs.64,963 onwards |
| Body Type | ||
| Motor Power | 250 W | 250 W |
| User Rating | ||
| Motor Type | BLDC | - |
| Charging Time | 4 Hr | 3-4 Hr |
| Range | 70-75 km/charge | 100 km/charge |
| EMI Starts | ₹ 2,125 Rate of interest @9.7%* for 3 years | ₹ 1,894 Rate of interest @9.7%* for 3 years |
| Insurance | Rs.3,594 Falcon Insurance | Rs.3,463 Atum Version 1.0 Insurance |
| Colours | Red | BlackBlueGreyOrangeWhite |
| Brochure | ||
View More | ||
| Engine and Transmission | ||
|---|---|---|
| Motor Power | 250 W | 250 W |
| Range (Eco Mode) | 70-75 km/charge | - |
| Range (Sport Mode) | 65-70 km/charge | - |
| Starting Describes how the engine is initiated. Most petrol bikes use electric starters, kick starters, or both, to commence engine operation. | Remote Start,Push Button Start | Push Button Start |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charger Output | - | 336 W |
| Instrument Console This refers to the display panel on a petrol bike that shows essential information like speed, RPM, fuel level, and other indicators such as engine temperature and gear position. | Digital | Digital |
| USB Charging Port | Yes | No |
| Speedometer Displays the current speed of the bike in kilometers per hour (km/h) or miles per hour (mph), providing crucial information for safe riding. | Digital | Digital |
View More | ||
| Features and Safety | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging Point | Yes | - |
| Gradeability | 8 Degree | - |
| Riding Modes | Yes | - |
| Additional Features This refers to unique features or upgrades specific to a particular model or variant of the petrol bike, which may include enhanced performance components, aesthetic improvements, or technology integrations. | Smart Breakdown Maintenance Status, Smart Parking Assistance, Integrated Locking System, Regenerative Braking System, LED Turn Signals Placed in Handlebar, 72 V Smart Controller | Charger Warranty - 1 Year |
View More | ||
Add another bikes to comparison
| Dimensions and Capacity | ||
|---|---|---|
| Width These dimensions describe the physical size of the bike. Width represents the distance across the widest part of the bike, length is the distance from front to back, and height is the vertical measurement from the ground to the highest point of the bike. | 740 mm | - |
| Length | 1790 mm | - |
| Height | 1100 mm | - |
| Saddle Height Indicates the distance from the ground to the top surface of the bike's seat, influencing rider comfort and accessibility, especially for shorter or taller individuals. | - | 750 mm |
View More | ||
| Electricals | ||
|---|---|---|
| Headlight | LED | LED |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
| DRLs | Yes | - |
View More | ||
| Tyres and Brakes | ||
|---|---|---|
| Front Brake Diameter Refers to the diameter of the disc or drum used for the front brake system on a petrol bike, influencing braking performance and heat dissipation. | - | 180 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter Indicates the diameter of the disc or drum used for the rear brake system, contributing to the bike's overall braking effectiveness and control. | - | 160 mm |
| Performance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Top Speed | 25 km/Hr | 25 km/Hr |
| Motor & Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Motor Type | BLDC | - |
| Battery Capacity | 1.8 Kwh | - |
| Underpinnings | ||
|---|---|---|
| Frame | - | High Carbon steel tubular frame |
Competitors of Benling Falcon and Atumobile Atum Version 1.0
User Reviews of Comparison
- Falcon
- Atum Version 1.0
Recommended Bikes
- Electric Bikes
- Popular Bikes
- Upcoming Bikes
- Latest Bikes
FAQs on Benling Falcon and Atumobile Atum Version 1.0
Which bike is better Benling Falcon or Atumobile Atum Version 1.0?
Which bike among Benling Falcon and Atumobile Atum Version 1.0 is cheaper?
